Bill Kanatas and Ben Salzberg, are experienced real estate developers, specializing in Class A facilities, often involving the repositioning of closed, dark spaces or ground-up construction. Their strategy is primarily that of a merchant builder, aiming to develop and sell these properties within a three to five-year window after stabilization. They highlighted the importance of community engagement and building trust with municipalities during the entitlement process, especially when addressing concerns about new developments. A key to their success in the Chicago area, despite its high property taxes, has been securing tax incentives, such as the 7B designation, and developing in TIF districts, which showcases their expertise in navigating complex local regulations.
This Episode is Also Sponsored by the Lending Home. Lending Home Offers Reliable & Low Cost Fix & Flip Loans with Interest Rates as Low as 9.25%. Buy & Hold Loans Offered Even Lower. Get a FREE IPad when you Close Your First Deal by Registering Now at http://REILineOfCredit.com
Ben Salzberg, Bill Kanatas & I Discuss Self Storage Development:
- Merchant Builder Strategy for Self-Storage (00:05:40)
Ben and Bill break down their merchant builder strategy where properties are developed and sold within a three to five-year window after stabilization. - Focus on Class A Self-Storage and RV/Boat Storage (00:14:38)
Ben and Bill share how they found huge wins by concentrating on Class A self-storage and RV/boat storage, which often involve the repositioning of closed, dark spaced or ground-up construction. - Navigating the Entitlement Process and Building Municipal Trust (00:11:31)
Ben and Bill discuss some valuable tips on how you can prepare for the entitlement process and the right way to build municipal trust, which are two essential components in a successful real estate transaction. - Overcoming Chicago’s Property Tax Challenges with Incentives (00:20:12)
Ben and Bill talk about their experiences doing business in the Chicago area, particularly with how they navigate its complex tax hurdles and take advantage of all available incentives. - Strategic Cleanup of Environmentally Challenged Sites (00:24:57)
Ben and Bill explain the right and compliant process of cleaning up overgrown properties to restore their best state and even make the necessary improvements.
Relevant Episodes: (200+ Content Packed Interviews in Total)
- Self Storage Development with Fernando Angelucci
- Self Storage Investing with Equity Warehouse Founder Ian Horowitz
- Self Storage Redevelopment with Scott Krone
- Transforming Big-Box Retail into Self-Storage: A Conversation with Clint Harris
Listen to the podcast here
Self Storage Development With Ben Salzberg & Bill Kanatas
Bill Kanatas and Ben Salzberg, welcome to the show. How are you guys doing?
Great, Dan. How are you doing?
I’m doing well.
Thank you for having us on your show.
Introducing Ben Salzberg And Bill Kanatas
Why don’t we get started so the guests have a chance to see who Bill and Ben are? Bill, we’ll start with you. Could you share a few highlights of your real estate development career?
I started many years ago doing retail strip centers, office buildings, and office condos. I did some residential development that I have developed over the years, primarily bringing the land, water, sewer, and streets, and developing the lots and selling them to builders. After that, I quickly got involved in some larger projects like ground-up development of storage facilities, as well as car washes, and some strip centers. We did one in St. Petersburg, Florida, several years ago, over 100,000 square feet. We developed some Fifth Third Bank, Auto Zone, and stuff like that in our portfolio.
Are you solely focused on storage lately?
Yeah. We’re concentrating on climate-controlled self-storage, as well as boat and RV storage.
I’m in the same lane there. That’s great. Ben?
My background is focused on managing brokers for over 30 years in Illinois. My background is in Engineering MBA, specializing in Six Sigma and quality. I’ve been in the commercial world. I did a lot of the air rights for the Boeing Center downtown. I saved about $50 million, looking at companies, assessing them, and making them more efficient and profitable. I looked at all of the classes of corporations that I’ve been working at and realized how good self-storage is as far as an investment and how resistant it is in the industry for any type of situation that’s going on with the economy, and I was looking to focus on that.
I kept it in my memory and met with Bill. Bill and I talked about it. We’re like, “We should start a company focusing on this self-storage arena.” My knowledge in statistics, Six Sigma, Lean, and engineering brings a host of skills to be able to develop, analyze, and know where to put these particular facilities. We have such a great team. I would love to discuss with you more about what we’ve been doing.
Are you guys doing 100% ground up, or is there some redevelopment of sites, or even buying of self-storage facilities, and doing a turnaround? What is the primary focus of self-storage developers?
We would love to do conversions, especially in Chicago. Conversions get to the market a lot quicker because we can work through winter conditions. For our first self-storage facility, we purchased a former Burlington Coat Factory that had closed. It was an eyesore for the village because it stayed vacant for probably about three years, if I recall correctly.
We came in there and we were able to talk to the city about bringing it back online and on the tax row. We converted that one. It was about 78,000 square feet of the Burlington Coat Factory. The ceiling heights were high enough in one of the areas where we could build a mezzanine in there. We added a second floor. I think we have about 90,000 of net rentable. There was like 89,980. The total footprint became 128,000 square feet. We do love conversions. We haven’t purchased any assets that were in trouble or needed a little bit of reviving. We would either do a ground-up construction or repositioning of a closed, dark space.
The nice thing about doing ground-up construction is that you can go to the areas where the numbers fit so well, and the profitability of it is so high that it makes sense to do ground-up construction. It’s something that people don’t understand or realize because there are these pockets and people who are moving and growing these communities who need self-storage. Those are the areas and pockets that Bill and I are filling in.
When you do ground-up construction, you can go into an area where the number fits so well and the profitability is so high.
Merchant Builder Strategy For Self-Storage
You guys are typically building these to sell more of a merchant builder situation, build it, develop it, sell it to maybe an institutional owner at a very favorable cap rate, and pay off all of the investor capital and keep it moving. There’s not much, if any, operating over a decade in the plan. Is that accurate?
Ideally, yeah. As developers, we’re always willing to change our plan. We’re merchant builders. You’re spot on. We’re looking to find that diamond in the rough. By the way, I love the diamond right behind you. Ben and I, and the team, will find that diamond in the rough. We’ll polish it and take it through the entitlement process. That’s what creates the value.
It’s not easy to find a piece of property and say, “We’re going to build self-storage here.” There’s a lot of work that goes behind the scenes. The municipalities don’t love that. When we were developing car washes, they were concerned about the noise. “The noise, we can’t have that.” When you sit down with a municipality and you explain to them the advantages and the need for the community, then they open up.
It takes a while. We do develop these self-storages. We get the communities to say yes. As Ben said, to his point, we’re able to find the market in the pocket. With that said, there are investors who want to keep this longer term. If our partners want to stay in this for 10 years versus 3 to 5 years, then Ben and I are also open to that. I’d like to say that the investors help guide that timeframe, but more so than others, we’re going to be flipping this out in 3 to 5 years because everybody wants to redeploy that capital into something else.
For the audience, the merchant builder is like fixing and flipping houses. We have a lot of fix-and-flip investors. We do hundreds of those ourselves per year on the audience and our email lists. Merchant building is like fixing and flipping a house, and then owning it long-term is like the landlord who’s 75 has owned everything for 40 years, never sells anything, and refuses to sell more long-term operations.
There are pros and cons to both sides. I think one of the risks that exists in self-storage is the potential for it to be overbuilt. If they open 2 or 3 facilities and are too close of a driving radius, suddenly, maybe you don’t get the rent growth long-term that you hoped for. I have not seen a ton of that. I know we’re going to get into avoiding that as well. You are also doing the construction and bringing verticals. It’s not just the entitlement of the land and then selling it to someone else.
We do dirt to doors. We develop the entire project.
At the end of that project, let’s say it’s maybe 12 to 18 months of actual construction?
That’s about right. Once you start going into construction and breaking ground, the general contractors will tell you it’s 10 to 12 months. Again, depending on where you’re building. If you’re in Arizona, it’s different than building in Chicago. The 12 to 18 months is a great window, but we’ve been very fortunate to get them right around 12 months.
The partnership on that deal is also going to hold that until you lease up a percentage of the units to stabilize it, get the cashflow looking right, and sell it. What time period would that be? Construction is done, and then how many more years until the build is ready? The fix and flip is done. We’re ready to exit at the retail value, if you will.
We tell the investors a 3-to-5-year window after we open up the doors.
Have you guys had some exits in the last 2 to 3 years?
Not in self-storage. We had some exits on the car washes, but we opened up our first one in 2022. We started the project in ‘21. That’s still operating. We’re over 75% occupied there. Public Storage is operating it and doing a great job. Our second investment, we did exit. We exited quickly. It was an Extra Space project. Ben and I purchased the land, closed on it, took it through the whole full entitlement process, and got it approved.
We’re talking about a full plan. Architectural was done, structural was done, and engineering was done. Permits are in hand. We were about to go vertical, but somebody knocked on our door, and they happened to be an Extra Space builder themselves and offered us a good dollar amount. Ben and I decided to exit that investment and concentrate on the next two that we’re working on.
On the Extra Space one, was that already a syndicated deal with partners involved at that point, or was the capital raise not quite done yet? Fill me in on how that shook out, if there were partners, and how they are meeting.
We didn’t finish the equity raise on that one because we wanted to wait until we had the full entitlement process ready to go. That’s what we typically do. We try to remove the risk for the investors. We find a property, we tie it up, we spend all of our money on the architect, engineers, civil, and all that stuff.
Once you’re ready to go vertical, we start putting our private placement memorandum together, and then we go and raise capital, either with individuals, family offices, funds, you name it. In this particular instance, we closed on the land and tied it up primarily with our capital. Before we had the chance to go to the market and start raising the capital, somebody was interested in purchasing it, so we decided to flip it.
Navigating The Entitlement Process And Building Municipal Trust
Online and doing my research, I found the Hanover Park meeting minutes. It looked almost like a rubber stamp of approval. You guys were looking for a floor area variance. It looked like they had it before. It was probably pretty simple. It didn’t look like you had a whole lot of pushback in that entitlement piece that I found. Is that your experience in general? I hear a lot of nightmares. I’ve been involved in some, where it doesn’t go quickly, and you don’t get what you’re looking for. That’s the entitlement risk that you’re alluding to. Do you guys have the experience of 20, 30 years?
You have to make relationships. It’s building those relationships and getting everybody on the same page, so that when you start to do all the work, everybody knows what you’re doing.
A lot of that is time invested before the meeting, and paperwork is filed.
This is what’s important to understand. Ben can talk a little bit more about this. Ben is an elected official at a college. When you’re dealing with board members for the first time, they’re looking at you as a developer, and you’re here to take something from them. A lot of times, developers make promises with pretty pictures, “Here’s our architect. We’re going to drive everything to you.” By the time it’s all said and done, it doesn’t look as pretty as they said it was. It wasn’t built to the quality that they said it was.
You’ve got to build that trust with the community, as well as the village and the board members. Ultimately, they’re going to vote for it. It’s important to deliver what you said you’re going to deliver. Once you don’t deliver what you said you’re going to deliver, it won’t be long before other board members in other communities start talking about that.
I’ve been developing for 30 years. When I did retail strip centers, office buildings, and office condos, there was a lot of pushback. Especially, as I mentioned a little bit earlier, when it comes to the car washes. People were very concerned about the noise. They were also concerned about people hanging out, watching their cars, and playing loud music. Who is going to come there? What’s the crowd you’re attracting?
It’s the same thing with self-storage. Who are you attracting? Is this going to be a homeless community? Are people going to be living in your units? What is it going to look like? What is security like? These are everything that we like to address when we sit down with the community, with the mayor, and also the economic developer, because these are good concerns. I would be concerned. You would be concerned if these were coming into your community. The key here is to address them and deliver. Once you deliver and they understand that you’re not about taking, you’re also giving back to the community. That’s important.
This is all about community development. This is all about giving back to the community. Self-storage is about giving back to every homeowner, and they have a product they can use. It’s not like you wanted to get everybody on board with it.
Self storage is about giving back to every homeowner.
Focus On Class A Self-Storage And RV/Boat Storage
I saw some commentary in that same application, or the meetings there, where you guys were talking about, I don’t know if it was specifically the word facade, but using certain types of doors in the design, where it was going to fit more. It almost looked like you’re illustrating the Class A nature of this product.
Maybe you could elaborate more on your thoughts, like we’re under contract right now. We’re closing a car wash that we’re selling. It’s old and existing, the kind where you put the quarters in, and it has the pump and the spray. If someone came and wanted to build that across the street from my condo building, I’m going to show up for the meeting and turn it down. My buddy, Glen Stygar, built 12 or 13 of these Woodie’s Wash Shacks in the St. Petersburg area.
They’re like what I would consider Class A car washes, brand new. There are the vacuums out there. They’ve got all the bells and whistles, and it’s a totally different environment because that’s what I would think of as a Class A car wash. Could you touch on what you think of as a Class A storage facility, maybe in comparison to a B, a C, or something else, where maybe the zoning board wants to shut that down because they don’t want that there, but they’re willing to put your Class A product there?
This is a generated model that is a Class A facility. It’s a very modern type of facility with the glass windows here. You have bays underneath that can store boats or cars. These are the type of Class A facilities. Maybe 120,000 square feet, fully air-conditioned, with automation in there, high-end facilities. Different types of materials are being used. Those are the type of Class A facilities.
What would be a Class B facility?
For me and to Ben’s point, one of the Hanover Parks that you were mentioning earlier had a full drive-through. You drive in one end, come out the other. In Chicago, that’s great for us, and for security, too. If you’re going there later at night, you want to be able to stay in your car. The door closes behind you, and nobody is there. You open up your car, and you unload. That gives you the added Class A security.
A Class B, for me, may not have all the bells and whistles. In our Class A facilities, we have somebody who works there. Our hours may be 6:00 AM, but by 9:00, we have an actual person working there. They can walk you around, they can show you the facility, they can get you registered, they can take your credit card payments, and all that stuff.
Some of the Class B facilities may not have that as an extra service to have somebody there. It may not be climate-controlled. If it is climate-controlled, it may be outdoor unloading where we have either a drive-through or drive-in bay. The Class A are built brand new. They have all these automated things in place, including the doors where you can lock or unlock them with your keypad. You have access on your cell phone. All those amenities go into a Class A facility.
To clarify, the Class B might look more like a row of garages or like five separate rows of garages.
That I was about to say. You’re driving down on some farmland, you’re like, “Look at those out there.” One level of facilities, and you have 20 or 30 bays, and non-climate-controlled.
When I started to invest in self-storage and become a partner in several organizations, I remember telling a family member about, “I’m putting my money in storage.” It’s like, “Is the land well located?” His mind went back to the self-storage was more of a land bank strategy. Maybe that’s how it was 15 or 20 years ago. You took this old building and you were going to hold it until the whole neighborhood changed, and then someday it would become condos and it would be like a vibe city, a Chicago downtown neighborhood with $500 rents, whatever it is.
I was like, “No.” I think the entire industry has shifted. We had public storage, and we have Extra Space. There are a few others that are very large like that. I feel like it’s gone from land bank, the farmers trying to generate income out of those garages, to something more of a business model that operates almost like a retail concept these days. The automation, the caliber of the facade, and the building behind you, Ben, have morphed into something a lot more evolved than it was twenty years ago, like my family member thought when I said self-storage.
I agree with that. It’s a different mindset that people are looking at self-storage now. It’s like living. You have an apartment or a condo. It’s something that you have to have. It’s not just something second mind. It’s right there. Like an apartment, I need self-storage.
People have a different mindset about self storage nowadays. Just like having an apartment or a condo, it has become something you need to have.
I probably need some myself. Both of my condo things in the basement are filled. I don’t know why I don’t break down and become a customer.
Maybe by the time the show is over, we can have you on as one of our customers.
Overcoming Chicago’s Property Tax Challenges With Incentives
That’s right. Give us an idea of 2 or 3 of the cities where you’ve been successful so far.
Hanover Park, you mentioned. Chicago Ridge which is a suburb of Chicago. We have a project there that we’ll be closing on the land. We had to go through the entitlement process. To your point, it’s a little challenging, but they welcome the development. It’s a piece of property that’s an eyesore for the city. I think the fact that somebody is willing to come in there and develop it, they’re very happy about. As we mentioned, we got that 7B, or maybe we didn’t mention it, but we were talking about a tax incentive that is available here on this property. It’s also in a TIF. The village realized that it needed to create a TIF to attract developers. We’re one of the developers that they attracted there, and we’re going to build it there.
We’ve been successful in getting that rezoned. Not only did we have to get it rezoned, which we did successfully, but we also needed to get a special permit for it. It was not only the process of getting it rezoned, but you needed a special use permit to allow it to operate as a self-storage facility as well. We got that one done. We’re working right now on a piece of property in Palmdale, California. The village there had been open to self-storage. We’ve sent them some renderings, and we’re showing them what we’re doing there. I think that’s going to be a successful self-storage facility as well.
Was Hanover Park the exit to Extra Space?
Yes.
When I first looked you guys up, I was excited to have you on because I see there’s a lot of development going on in Chicago. Everybody who has come across my audience here has mostly been out of other areas and avoided Cook County for the tax issues. There is a monumental problem with the property tax situation in Cook County. In certain villages of Cook County, even in the city of Chicago, certain properties are so impossible to make them work, even from the tenant’s perspective. The tenant on a triple net lease has to eat the taxes, so they have a higher risk of large increases as time goes on. I was like, “Here are some guys who are putting a shovel in the ground in the Chicago land region. This is amazing. I can’t wait to have them on.”
It was more amazing to hear you talk about the 7B designation for the development in Chicago Ridge to mitigate that risk. Any one of my friends who’s not investing in Chicago is well aware of why, and that’s the tax situation, and you’ve been able to get that as a solution. I guess you guys must have penciled that out. That was part of constructing that deal on the front end. It’s not like you bought the land and then hatched his plan later.
There was the whole process from the beginning to get there.
Without that incentive, it wouldn’t pencil out.
Bill and I are pretty good experts in that arena to make things work. That’s what sets us apart from a lot of the rest of the developers.
That took a while. I don’t want the audience to think, “We’re just going to check that box and apply for it, and we got it.” It isn’t like that. A lot of hard work went behind there. You have to prove that it needs it. They’re not giving it away for no reason. This property was undeveloped for 20-plus years, 30-plus years. It was an abandoned site where people were driving by and throwing whatever they could on it.
It did have some challenges with the EPA, so Ben and I cleaned that up. That took a long time with the EPA to apply for the plan and get it approved, etc. When we close on the land, it’ll be completely cleaned up, and we have our incentives in place. We were able to start breaking ground with that. You may or may not know, Chicago passed an ordinance to try to stop Chicago from developing new self-storage facilities, and only allowing the rezoning in certain areas of Chicago. I think that’s going to help Chicago Ridge if no new developments are being developed in the Chicago area. We think that this is going to be a home run for us.
Strategic Cleanup Of Environmentally Challenged Sites
Interesting. Phase one environmental came back bad. Phase two environmental, which is where they did core samples, also showed stuff that needed to be done. I think it’s phase three where they give you the remediation plan, and that’s what has to be approved by the EPA. Was there a cost to clean that up? Would you mind double-clicking on that? I think it would be an interesting segue here for the audience.
The three boxes are surprise, surprise, surprise. We checked off all three boxes. It took a long time to get the EPA, and the environmental engineers did a great job putting together an action plan. A lot of testing, a lot of boring samples, a lot of testing, but the EPA signed off on the actual action plan. The bid is under $100,000, but it’s to be said because, truth be told, until it’s completely dug out and sent to the haulers and they weigh it and they accept it, then they send you the bill later.
We’re estimating about $70,000. It’s in two tranches. Tranche one is going to one site that’s going to accept it. The second part of that is going to a different site, which comes with a different dollar amount. When it’s all said and done, we can now follow up on another episode, but we’re estimating about $70,000 in hauling fees and dump fees.
For context for the audience, the average in phase one is like $5,000. The average in phase two is between $10,000 and $20,000, and I’ve never bought a phase three. These are due diligence items, and you’re paying for this money while you’re under contract for the land. You don’t even know if you’re going to be able to clear the environmental and buy it. Do you mind sharing insight on the cost of the engineer’s work to come up with that plan, Bill?
The environmental engineers are probably in the neighborhood of about $40,000 when it’s all said and done. The civil engineers are in the $70,000 range. This is where development is very risky. Hopefully, this keeps some people not wanting to develop right next to you, if that makes any sense. Chicago Ridge is not going to allow another one because there’s not a market for it. Hanover Park, too, when we talk to the village, they said they’re not looking for any more self-storage directly in Hanover Park.
That limits our exposure from another guy opening up across the street. That’s good or bad, but we like to do all this work before we bring the investors in. The investors are not taking the risk of losing their money. Ben and I are taking the risk upfront. There are risks and rewards. When we do go vertical and we do have investors come in, there’s a balance between the risks and the rewards on development sites.
Have you guys ever killed a deal during this part before you got entitlement, and you lose all the due diligence money? What’s the hit rate? Are you 50% of the sites, 70%, 80%, or 100% of the sites? Clear it and get to being able to build?
There are dead costs involved in any type of development, and you build them into the business plan.
Ben hit it right on the nose. We walked away from a deal in the playing field that didn’t pencil out for us. We walked away and lost earnest money in Hampshire, Illinois, from a deal that we thought was going to go well. We had one in Michigan. We didn’t lose any money on that one, but we had that tied up. Money is also time. When we’re driving to the sites and you’re looking at them and spending time with not only mine and Ben’s time, we have a team here, as well as consultants.
You spend money. You spend $5,000 on a report here, $5,000 on a report here, and you end up walking away. Yes, it’s a dead cost, but that’s part of the development game. We’re not new to this. As I said earlier, we’ve been doing this for many years. There is money that you’re going to lose on some of those deals, and you make it up on the ones that will be your home runs.
Closer Look At The Site In Chicago
For the audience, if you’re going to invest in a ground-up development, I think that helps paint the picture for where to look out for risk, and where they are in the process. Do we have the plans before they’re asking for the wire, or no? Let’s double-click on this site in Chicago Ridge to walk through what this looks like from the investors. We’ll start with how big the site is and how big the building will be.
The footprint is it’s a three-story building. It’s going to have a full drive-through. You’ll drive in one end, unload, and then drive out the other end. We’ll also have a drive-in bay for unloading. You get the benefit of either a drive-in, a drive-in bay, or a complete drive-through. The site is about 5 acres. The footprint of the building is about 128,000 square feet. Public storage is going to be our operator on that one, and civil is finishing up all their drawings right now. We can submit to the MWRD for the water and sewer. We won’t have a full sewer line there, but we’ll have it for stormwater.
We’re finishing up with the architecture right now. To be honest with you, we’re waiting for a little bit more tweaks on the unit mix. We learned from our development that we had in Burbank, we probably should have had more of the 5x5s, very popular with people in this area. The 5x5s also generate more money per square foot. It makes more logical sense to put more of the 5x5s, 10x15s seem to be popular. We wanted to change the mix to add some more 10x15s here as well.
Do you guys have any insight on what the cost basis will be, maybe the cost to build per foot, and then maybe what the finished or projected stabilized exit price per foot might be?
We have about $81 per square foot on the cost of it. That doesn’t include the land cost. We think it’ll be worth somewhere in the neighborhood of $20 million to $21 million.
That’s about what they go for.
Yeah, so $128,000 gross. I can’t do it that quickly in my head, but Ben is a statistician. He could probably do it quicker than I can. All in all, the development is going to be about $15 million. It’s going to be a little bit less, probably about $14.5 million. The capital from the investors, let’s say, is $4 million. If you exited $20 million, it’s not a bad day.
I guess I’m doing the math on $21 million. It’s like $164 a foot. Does that sound about right?
It could, yeah.
Who’s a buyer for this kind of thing? Public storage, I would assume they were the owners, but no, they’re actually doing management and operating a facility. Do they gear up and then eventually buy this from you guys, or are a lot of these buildings that we drive by and see all the time owned by third-party, other investment institutions?
We were hoping that you would be the buyer for it. If you ask a public storage why they got into the business of third-party management, it wasn’t to make a profit. I don’t know if they’re making a profit now, I’m assuming they are, but that wasn’t their motivation. Their motivation was to get in there, have a presence, continue to grow their brand, and while they’re in there, they’re looking at your operations, clearly. They’re driving the revenue to your property again, so they know where they’re going to be in 6 months, 9 months, or 12 months from now, so they’re the likely buyer.
Same thing with Extra Space and CubeSmart and any of the other guys that are offering third-party management. It is our goal to sell it to them, but not necessarily to them. They may not be the best buyer. Extra Space might want to increase their footprint and throw public storage out and become an Extra Space, or CubeSmart, or any of the smaller ones, any of those guys that are coming space to this market. Any of those guys who want to be here potentially can be a buyer.
Dissecting The Waterfall Structure
One of the things we were working on was trying to get Extra Space to exit us out quite a bit, and then the stock price changed, so their appetite to buy had changed. You’re having to play the market from public storage or this one or that one. What does the waterfall structure look like here? What percentage of the deal goes to you as the general partner? What percentage goes to the passive investors? Maybe you could talk about things like the IRR, the cash-on-cash, and maybe the minimum investment, and that kind of thing.
I’d be happy to run that through. In this particular model, what we’re looking to do is we’re going to bring investors in for the full capital stack. For argument’s sake, I’ll say it’s $5 million. It’s less than that, but easy numbers. Ben and I typically will take some of that equity stack ourselves to show that we also have money on the LP side. We break it up between the GP side and the LP side. The general partners take on the majority of the risk, and they will sign and guarantee the debt, whereas the limited partners will not guarantee that debt.
They’ll come in after the debt is already secured and ready to go vertical. They’re not going to sign the loan documents. Ben and I will do that. These loans are full recourse, which means if something goes south, they’re coming after Ben and me, our company, and our assets. They’re not coming after the limited investors.
We set it up where they own 100% of the preferred shares, which are Class A shares. Ben and I, and our company, would take the Class B shares. They have 100% ownership of those. We give them 60% of all the profits when we liquidate the asset, and we also give them a 10% preferred rate of return on their investment. There may be some distributions prior to the exit of the investment. In this particular one, we’re shooting in year three. It’ll have some revenues to start paying some of that pref rate.
If we fast forward to the end of the day and we’re ready to sell the asset, the investors will get the accrued 10%. The first check that will be written is the mortgage. You pay off the mortgage. The second check will go to the investors, so they get 100% of their equity back. The next check will be a 10% accrued from day one, even when they give us the money, not when we open up the doors. They’ll get that money. What’s left over will be a 60-40 split, 60% in favor of the investors and 40% in favor of our company.
Ordinarily, I would probably look for something that’s a 20-80. A lot of the private equity deals that we do are 20% to the GP, 80% to the LPs. However, those deals are structured recently, even ones I’m invested in, with maybe a 6% preferred return. Having the 10% preferred return helps tip the needle. When the 10% preface caught up, now you guys are doing 40-60 to the limited partners. Is that accurate?
That’s accurate. I’ve seen similar deals. Ben and I have also invested in other deals. Sometimes you’ve got to peel back the onion because the sponsor might have a guaranteed fee for signing the loan. There’s a percentage of 2 or 3 there. It might have an acquisition fee. There might be a few points in there. There may be some other fees in there. At the end of the day, it may not be too far off from a 60-40 split.
That makes sense.
I’m always telling investors to read the private placement memorandum, understand where the money is going, look at the sources and uses, and make sure you understand that. We always say, “Apples to apples.”
Investors must always read the private placement memorandum to understand where the money is going.
I have a few wrap-up questions here, but I want to give you a chance to plug a website or any contact information. Now will be a good time to do that.
We have a website, Self-StorageDevelopers.com. I believe people can contact me if they need to contact me. I always put my information, my cell phone number is out there to everybody. 847-338-5517. Anybody can give me a call. My email is very easy, [email protected]. I’d love to talk to everyone.
We forgot to plug the IRR expected on that deal. That might be helpful. Maybe a question.
That’s a great question. The target IRR is North of 20%. I think right now, we’re about 21.22%, and the cash-on-cash is over 30%. Luckily for us, we’re getting a new model from Public Storage that’s coming through. It looks like the market rates have gone up in Chicago Ridge. I think we’re at $1.85 for the walk-in rate. The online was $1.61, $1.70-ish.
We typically do a new model right before we’re about to go vertical. Assuming the rates get a little bit better, then it’ll be a little bit better on the IRR if the construction costs come a little bit lower than we have anticipated. I know you’re like, “Is that possible?” It is possible. Ben always works with our engineers, so we could do some cost savings there. That might also help the IRR as well.
Are there any cost segregation benefits there? Are you guys going to build it to a cost segregation where there might be some tax benefits that way?
We’re planning on doing that.
For the audience, everyone who invests in these kinds of deals, builds these kinds of deals, and runs syndications, we are all collectively holding our breath right now on the big beautiful tax bill or whatever. If it passes and it has our costs 100% bonus depreciation, we’ll all be dancing a jig here. Raising money will be a lot easier for the syndicators. It’ll be a little harder for the little guy to get his $50,000, $100,000, $200,0000 into each deal because they’ll go so quickly.
Especially in this economy. The uncertain times and what’s happening with Wall Street, this is a great time. Real estate is a good time to invest in, and self-storage is king in that.
Ben And Bill’s Book Recommendations
A quick couple of questions here as we wrap. I’ll ask each of you individually here. Is there a book that you found most helpful as you were getting into real estate development? It’s something that, in the real estate development world, this book came along. It could have been any time over the last 20 to 30 years, whatever it was. Is there a book of that nature that would be very interesting to read, coming from that context?
For me, it’s less of a book and more of an author. In 2009, I went to a Jack Canfield conference. I had finished doing a bunch of real estate. I found Jack. I’m not sure who told me about it. I went there and I liked the way he delivered. He wasn’t talking about real estate. He was talking about the business mindset and what you should be thinking about.
He talked a little bit about meditation, a little bit about visualization. I connected with that. That was many years ago. To this day, I still listen to a little Jack Canfield, or I listen to visualization. I take time in the morning to try to visualize Chicago Ridge, and it’s under construction, and it’s working. It helps me through my times of continuing to push forward as a developer.
Ben?
I’m part of the Family Office Club with Richard Wilson. He created a book called The Family Office Book. It talks about managing investments for single-family through family offices, and even for real estate. I love that book. That’s a book that I believe in. I agree with the philosophies that go about in that book for investment. That’s how I think that a lot of small offices and single-family offices should invest in this type of asset class.
I enjoyed reading those books, especially those Family Office books, because it’s a small business. Even though they grow into large corporations, they start small, and it starts with the family. That’s why I love reading these Family Office books and The Family Office Club. I love that type of area, talking to all these people, and associating myself with fantastic people who have the same mindset.
Even though businesses eventually grow into large corporations, it starts small and within the family.
Richard was a guest on the show a few years ago.
I enjoy him. I enjoyed the club. I came back from New York. I met a lot of great people. To me, it’s like a family.
Random Acts Of Kindness
This is my final question, which I’m going to ask each of you individually again. We’ll start with you, Bill. What is the kindest thing anyone has ever done for you?
Outside of my wife saying yes? I had an old boss of mine. I’m talking about 30-plus years ago. I started working as a loan officer, and I wanted to buy the mortgage company. I didn’t like the way my boss was running it. One day, I jokingly said to him, “Sell me the company.” He said, “All right, give me $100,000.” I went to my old boss, who knew me and trusted me, and he gave me $100,000. I bought that company. I think that launched my career. It was a handshake. He knew me and trusted me. He gave me $100,000. I think that was probably one of the nicest things anybody has ever done for me.
I love it. Ben?
I ran for a political position at Oakton College as trustee. They voted for me. That was the kind thing that people could do, to write down and vote for me. I was working for a corporation. I turned them around. The CEO comes to me and says, “Thank you, Ben. Job well done. I love your work. We couldn’t have done this without you. You saved our company.” I think those were the kindest words I’ve ever heard.
I hope that if we asked that corporation the same question, they would say, “Ben Salzberg came in here,” and that would be their answer. “He saved our company.”
They would.
Here’s one thing that Ben and I are involved with. This is something that we do as a passion project. Many years ago, I co-founded an organization called FEED6. Your audience can go to FEED6.org. We’ve packed almost 9 million meals here in the Chicagoland area. We partnered with the Chicago Food Depository, Northern Illinois Food Bank, Salvation Army, and I got them together with corporations. We did an event with Fifth Third Bank and the Chicago Blackhawks at the arena downtown. We packed 50,000 meals that we donated to the Chicago Food Depository. We’re doing it all the time.
Dan, if you’re around the Chicagoland area, I would love to have you come to one of our events. We do a signature event every November with the Chicago Wolves. We call it Hunger Heroes, where we pack 100,000 meals for veterans, and we distribute them to veterans. We’d love to get your audience involved, to come and help us pack these meals, and then we donate them. It’s something that we love to do as our give back. We talked about earlier with the villages that we can’t always ask. We’ve got to give. This is part of our giving program. We’ve done 9 million meals. Hopefully, we’ll be at 10 million next year.
There’s a great place to wrap the episode. For a lot of our Chicagoland readers, I’m sure this will be right in our backyard. We’ll have to have to meet up in person there.
We’d love to have you guys at our events.
Ben and Bill, thank you.
Thank you so much.
Important Links
- Bill Kanatas on LinkedIn
- Ben Salzberg on LinkedIn
- Self-Storage Developers
- Ben Salzberg Email
- Leverage to Larger Deals Using Family Office Wealth with Richard Wilson
- The Family Office Book
- FEED6
Relevant Episodes: (200+ Content Packed Interviews in Total)
- Self Storage Development with Fernando Angelucci
- Self Storage Investing with Equity Warehouse Founder Ian Horowitz
- Self Storage Redevelopment with Scott Krone
- Transforming Big-Box Retail into Self-Storage: A Conversation with Clint Harris
About Benjamin Salzberg
Benjamin Salzberg brings a background rooted in engineering and quality control, with an MBA specializing in Six Sigma. He has spent over three decades as a commercial real estate broker in Illinois and has recently focused on self-storage investment, recognizing its resilience and strong industry growth. Benjamin combines his analytical skills, engineering background, and strategic insights to identify and develop successful self-storage projects.
About Bill Kanatas
Bill Kanatas is a highly experienced real estate developer with over 30 years of expertise spanning retail strip centers, office buildings, residential projects, and, most recently, self-storage facilities. His focus has evolved towards climate-controlled storage and boat/RV storage, with a strong emphasis on land development, entitlements, community relations, and environmental remediation.